Debate Torturing terrorists is a tool to get the right feedback and answers Essay

Terrorists s to a faultl ca apply so m whatsoever deaths in the world. Whenever a terrorist approach shot occurs, it leaves behind many another(prenominal) an(prenominal) deaths and conclusion of property. Those who survive the struggle often terminus up with serious injuries. whatever become crippled for the rest of their lives. Some become traumatized in their inherent lives. The memory of the onrush keeps on haunting them. Such trauma continues to an result that some pot become depressed. In this regard, terrorism is a feebleness that should be fought by all meat. In a ticking-bomb scenario, there is a bomb that may detonate in an unidentified public beat actually known. The mortal who planted the bomb is the barely mortal who knows where it is. The person is held up by the police. However, person is non leave al unitying to bemuse the culture to the police. Torture will be the only means to except the teaching. A venture terrorist should never be forgiv en for a terrorism exercise (Aringo, 2004 13). Therefore, rack a terrorist to get crucial discipline that skunk sustain good bay window is a justifiable means.There be many reasons to support the design of unhinge a terrorist to get selective tuition that is relevant to save the usual public. First of all, when a terrorist or a suspected terrorist is gouged, he or she is likely to give relevant study that croup be use by the auspices agency to protect innocent passel. For instance, if a terrorist is captured and by dint of scud he or she reveals that there is a planned attack in the prox, because the government or the appointed mint will baffle necessary measures to ensure that the planned attack does not occur. hypothesize torture was not used, it is come-at-able that such in mouldation would not have been obtained. Consequently, the planned attack would have been executed and the result would be deaths and injuries. Therefore, agonizing is justified as long as the security officials argon very sure that they have the correct suspect.Secondly, terrorists are never co-operative. They cornerstonenot give any in foundation concerning their plans or new(prenominal) members willingly. Force has to be used to extract such information. The force used is in form of torture. When suspected terrorist is subjected to unsafe procedures, he or she is likely to give the information that move assistance in the in proveigence service (Meisels, 2008 21). Usually, terrorists have information about the future planned attacks as well as former(a) members of the gang. If the government and the security officials get such information, it becomes very easy to avert likely smuggled attacks. Since terrorists can never reveal such information willingly, then torture becomes the best alternative.Another reason that supports the use of torture to get information from a terrorist is that usually, the information obtained is timely. A terrorist who i s subjected to torture can reveal so many things that are yet to be accomplished by the gang. That opportuneness is essential in order to save the public from the hands of terroristic attacks. Without torture, the terrorist would take time before giving correct information. The worst scenario is that without torture, terrorists would not give any information at all. In this respect, torture is important if it can enable obtaining of information in a timely manner. Many people would be saved in time before the planned attack occurs.Moreover, terrorists cause more pang themselves to sol jaders when they capture them. Therefore, if terrorists can cause inconvenience to soldiers who are responsible for our security, there is no reason why a terrorist should be spared from pain as well. Accordingly, terrorists should be put finished a painful experience. If the pain they are subjected to makes them give information that is relevant in the intelligence service unit, then they should ne ver be spared it. Since terrorist are severe people in the society, no mercy should be accorded to them. They should be agonistic by all means to give all the relevant information that can help get rid of or capture other terrorists. rack terrorists may prove successful because it sometimes leads to obtaining more information than anticipated. When a terrorist is tortured, he or she may end up disclosure a lot of information that was not make up expected (White, 2012 32). For instance, unmatchable may be interrogating a terrorist about a planned attack in a given place, only to be told that there are many attacks planned in different places. Therefore, while security forces position that there is adept attack that is planned by terrorists, they get affect to learn that there are many attacks that have been planned. Such information becomes crucial because it opens the eyes of the security forces to other possible attacks other than the one that they anticipated. With regard to this argument, then it is justifiable to use torture to extract information from the terrorists.Moreover, terrorists cause too much pain and suffering to innocent people in the general public. They plan and execute their plans against innocent people who are otherwise helpless. Women and children get trapped in the thick of things when an attack occurs in a crowded place. Women and children are most vulnerable group for one reason. Children cannot run or hide from the spot of the attack. As a result, women who are mothers of the children in the scene get caught up while trying to save their children since they cannot go without them. That is not to say that men are spared from the attacks. Many of them die and others get injuries if they get themselves in the midst of the problems. Considering this pain that a terroristic activity can cause innocent people, terrorists de lot to be tortured without mercy. They are evil and merciless. There should be no mercy on them. If terrorists do not reveal relevant information that can save other people, the situation can be very dangerous. Torture is justified to be used on terrorists.In addition, if one considers that a superstar terrorist has potential to cause deaths of very many people one would find that torturing a suspected terrorist would be the least form of punishment that he or she would get. Pain on one person cannot be compared to the pain that may affect many innocent people in an final result a terroristic attack succeeded in happening. If one person can be made to reveal other members of the gang it can very fruitful. Sometimes, a single person who is a suspected terrorist can be used to track down all other members of the terrorism group. If security manages to furthert down many terrorists, it can be very successful because by so doing, many potential future attacks can be averted. It is important to note that when terrorists are free mingling with other innocent people, it is not possible to trac e them. It is until they are pinpointed that they become identifiable. It is other terrorists that can tell other people who are involved in the terrorism. If torture can help obtain such information from a single terrorist, then it is beneficial to the general public. Torture should be executed on the suspected terrorists without mercy because a terrorist is not a good person to compromise with.A terrorist is a cruel who is liable to a punishment later all. Other people who commit other forms of crimes are subjected to punishments. Terrorism is unconstipated a greater crime that deserves even more severe punishment. Therefore, torture is not unjust to a vicious who is a danger to the internal security itself. Since all criminals mustiness be punished for their actions ultimately, torturing terrorists can be taken to be a form of punishment too besides being a mechanism of extracting information from them. Many terrorists end up giving in to torture and surrender. Consequently , they tell the interrogators everything that they know regarding their criminal activities including their history and future plans. As a punishment, terrorists deserve it. As a means of extracting information, torture must be used. That way, torture achieves the objective of obtaining the unavoidable information while at the aforesaid(prenominal) time serving as a form of punishment.Many potential terrorists may hitch their activities at the prospects of getting caught and get subjected to torture. The torturing mechanism should be so severe that it discourages any person who may attempt a terroristic activity. Those who go through the torture may vow never to get involved in terrorism again in their life. They think of the pain that they went through and they stop any temptation to engage in terrorism. Therefore, the torturing process should serve as a punishment that sticks in the mind of the person even afterwards in the future. In this regard, torture will not only be usefu l in helping get the relevant information, but also it will help to discourage future attempts of terrorism by the prospective terrorists.Moreover, torturing a suspected terrorist may serve as lesson to other people who may be tempted to get involved in terrorism. They learn from the terrorists who have suffered a painful experience. The thought of getting caught and subjected to the same torture should be enough to discourage any one who may be thinking to engage in terrorism. In this respect, the torture must be so severe that it causes fear in people who may be influenced into terrorism. If torture achieves this objective, it will have helped a great deal in curbing terrorism. Whenever one person is tortured and serves as a lesson, there is overall reduction in the potential occurrence of terroristic events in the future. In addition, that helps to dismantle the unity of terrorists and decrease their numbers. All these results add up to help alleviate the occurrence of terrorism. Under normal circumstances, the risk that a single person may expose many other people to is very great to be ignored. As already stated, a single person has a potential to destroy and kill a rotund number of people. Considering such a risk, it is justifiable to use any form of torture on a suspected terrorist. Interrogating a single person can be the source of information that can end up saving the entire nation (Ramsay, 2006 42). Putting one person nether pain is justifiable if it can save more innocent lives. nock also that torturing only puts physical pain on the person. The pain is temporary because it ends with time. Such torture cannot be compared to the deaths that such person can cause besides the injuries that leave behind long lasting disabilities. cleanup is permanent. There is no reverse about it. In this regard, the benefits of torturing a single person for the sake of the welfare of the many are many and outweigh the cost of torture (Ginbar, 2010 32). If a person c an be put into a temporary pain and lead to saving of many lives, then it is worth the torture.In addition, it can be argued that with the advancements in technology, it is possible for the intelligence service to get the right person. Exchange of information betwixt different intelligence service agencies around the world makes it even easier. The opening night of subjecting an innocent person to torture is low. In this regard, it means that the person who ends up in the intelligence unit for research is most likely to be the right person. In other words, it is less likely that the person who is caught for the interrogation is the wrong person who is otherwise innocent. Therefore, torture should be applied on the suspected terrorists without considering the possibility of the person being innocent. Terrorism is a criminal activity that should never be subjected to compromise.In conclusion, torturing terrorists as a means of extracting information from terrorists is justified. Te rrorists are dangerous people and any means that can be used to get them from the society should be used. torture suspected terrorists has proven to be successful for it helps get information from the terrorists. In addition, torturing can be used as a form of punishment to terrorists. It is also used to discourage potential terrorists from engaging in the terroristic activities. It should be argued that pain on a single person should be used if in the end it leads to saving many lives. The only solicitude is that the person tortured could be innocent. However, considering the argument put forward, in the recent intelligence service, it is rare to aim an innocent person because before an arrest is done, proper investigation has to be done. Sharing of intelligence information amid intelligence units from different places in the world assists in this process.ReferencesArrigo,J.M. (2004). A utile argument against torture interrogation of terrorists. Science and Engineering Ethics , 4(3), 11-21.George Andreopoulos,R. (2011). International iniquitous Justice. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.Ginbar,Y. (2010). Why not torture terrorists? Moral, practical, and reasoned aspects of the ticking bomb justification for torture. Oxford Oxford University Press.Meisels,T. (2008). The trouble with terror Liberty, security, and the response to terrorism. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.Ramsay,M. (2006). screwing the torture of terrorist suspects be justified? The International daybook of Human Rights, 4(1), 23-26.Rumney,P.N. (2014). Torturing terrorists Exploring the limits of law, human rights, and academic freedom.Saul,B. (2004). Torturing terrorists after September 11. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 3(1), 32-36.White,J.E. (2012). Contemporary moral problems. Boston, MA Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.Source document